{"id":4115,"date":"2026-02-11T16:09:23","date_gmt":"2026-02-11T08:09:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chuxin-smt.com\/automatic-vs-manual-width-adjustment-smt-conveyor\/"},"modified":"2026-02-11T16:09:23","modified_gmt":"2026-02-11T08:09:23","slug":"automatic-vs-manual-width-adjustment-smt-conveyor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chuxin-smt.com\/pl\/automatic-vs-manual-width-adjustment-smt-conveyor\/","title":{"rendered":"Automatic vs Manual Width Adjustment SMT Conveyor Comparison (2026)"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure class=\"wp-block-image aligncenter size-large\"><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\" src=\"https:\/\/www.chuxin-smt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/1770797361-image_1770796577-hqk80ej6.jpeg\" alt=\"SMT line with PCB conveyors showing adjustable width rails and HMI recipe presets\" class=\"wp-image-4113\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.chuxin-smt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/1770797361-image_1770796577-hqk80ej6.jpeg 1536w, https:\/\/www.chuxin-smt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/1770797361-image_1770796577-hqk80ej6-300x200.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/www.chuxin-smt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/1770797361-image_1770796577-hqk80ej6-1024x683.jpeg 1024w, https:\/\/www.chuxin-smt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/1770797361-image_1770796577-hqk80ej6-768x512.jpeg 768w, https:\/\/www.chuxin-smt.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/1770797361-image_1770796577-hqk80ej6-18x12.jpeg 18w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1536px) 100vw, 1536px\" title=\"Automatic vs Manual Width Adjustment SMT Conveyor Comparison (2026) - S&amp;M Co.Ltd\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>If you run a medium\u2011mix SMT line with 3\u20139 product changeovers per day and board widths ranging roughly 80\u2013350 mm, the question isn\u2019t whether width adjustment matters\u2014it\u2019s how to set it so changeovers don\u2019t steal your shift.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TL;DR: For medium\u2011 and high\u2011mix environments, automatic width adjustment consistently wins on changeover time, repeatability, and error\u2011proofing; manual remains viable when you change width \u22642 times\/day or budgets force a phased retrofit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What width adjustment controls on an SMT conveyor<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Width adjustment sets the spacing of the edge rails that guide and center each PCB. Accurate centering protects board edges, reduces jams and false AOI rejects, and ensures smooth handoffs between machines. If you want a deeper primer on how conveyors fit the line tactically, see the educational overview in the Complete Guide to PCB Conveyors, which explains adjustable rails and SMEMA handshakes in context: <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.chuxin-smt.com\/pl\/slug-the-complete-guide-to-pcb-conveyors\/\">adjustable rails and SMEMA in a conveyor guide<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Quick verdict for automatic vs manual width adjustment SMT conveyor<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Below is a practical, decision\u2011oriented comparison. The emphasis is on the business outcome: cutting width\u2011switch time while maintaining quality and safety.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\">\n<table class=\"has-fixed-layout\">\n<colgroup><col \/><col \/><col \/><col \/><col \/><col \/><col \/><col \/><col \/><col \/><col \/><col \/><\/colgroup><tbody><tr><th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Method<\/p><\/th><th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Best for<\/p><\/th><th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Typical changeover time<\/p><\/th><th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Repeatability<\/p><\/th><th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Error risk<\/p><\/th><th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Integration<\/p><\/th><th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Traceability<\/p><\/th><th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Incremental CapEx 2026<\/p><\/th><th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Labor savings per month<\/p><\/th><th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Simple payback months<\/p><\/th><th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Retrofit complexity and install hours<\/p><\/th><th colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Maintenance burden<\/p><\/th><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Automatic width adjustment<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Medium\/high mix lines and regulated sectors<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>~10\u201345 s per preset recall on a single module when recipe\u2011driven; line\u2011wide time depends on number of modules<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>High; motorized positioning typically within sub\u2011millimeter to about \u00b10.5\u20131.0 mm depending on model<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Low; presets reduce mis\u2011centering and rail collisions<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Strong; SMEMA baseline with host or Hermes coordination is common<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Strong; bind presets to BoardId via recipes and log via CFX where available<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>+20\u201350% vs comparable manual module; confirm with vendor quotes<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>6\u201320 h\/month typical in medium mix, depending on shifts and stations<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>12\u201324 in many medium\u2011mix cases; verify with your inputs<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Medium; actuator kit plus PLC\/IO integration; typical install 4\u201316 h per module<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Moderate; adds actuator\/encoder checks; MTTR depends on spares and access<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Manual width adjustment<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Low\u2011mix lines with stable width and tight budgets<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>~60\u2013180 s per module depending on operator, gauges, and span<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Variable; depends on operator skill and gauges<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Higher; wrong setting can jam or mar board edges<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Basic; SMEMA pass\u2011through only<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Limited; manual settings rarely linked to BoardId<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Baseline; generally lowest purchase price<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Zero to minimal labor savings vs status quo<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>N\/A unless compared to current manual effort<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Low; no motors or IO changes; install 0\u20132 h<\/p><\/td><td colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\"><p>Low; fewer moving parts; periodic mechanical checks<\/p><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Data and methodology notes (as of 2026-02-11):<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><p>Sources: Standards statements are based on IPC-HERMES-9852 v1.6 and IPC CFX (IPC-2591) v2.0 materials linked below. Time-reduction figures cited in the next section come from the referenced NBK and Hitachi\/Circuitnet publications.<\/p><\/li><li><p>What is estimated vs. cited: Table ranges such as \u201c~10\u201345 s,\u201d \u201c\u00b10.5\u20131.0 mm,\u201d \u201c+20\u201350%,\u201d labor savings, and payback months are scenario-dependent estimates meant for planning only. Validate with your vendor\u2019s datasheets and a short on-line time study on your own line.<\/p><\/li><li><p>Pricing: All pricing is indicative, quote-driven, and subject to change as of 2026-02-11; always confirm with current vendor quotations.<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Standards note: Hermes v1.6 conveys BoardId and board metadata; width is typically set by recipes\/PLC logic rather than a standardized \u201cSet Width\u201d command. See the Hermes v1.6 specification and IPC CFX v2.0 update for details.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Changeover time and repeatability where automatic pulls ahead<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>The primary job here is to slash the seconds you spend between builds. Real\u2011world automation casework shows the direction and magnitude:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><p>An automation trial on handle\u2011based adjustments cut per\u2011change setup from 122.7 s to 13.2 s, a reduction of 109.5 s per event. Source: NBK mechatronics article with stopwatch data, 2024\u20132025: <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nbk1560.com\/en-US\/resources\/mechatronics\/article\/SMT\/\">automation cut setup time by more than a minute per change<\/a>.<\/p><\/li><li><p>A broader line changeover initiative reported more than 90% reduction when mechanical adjustments and barcode program changes were automated together. Source: Hitachi feature via Circuitnet (2020): <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.circuitnet.com\/news\/uploads\/2\/Hitachi_Technical_Feature_Article_Circuitnet_White_Paper.pdf\">greater than 90 percent reduction with automated changeovers<\/a>.<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Think of it this way: on a medium\u2011mix line with 6 width changes per day and just three affected modules, moving from ~90 s manual per module to ~20 s automatic frees roughly 3.5\u20134.0 minutes per change. Across two shifts and 22 working days, that\u2019s roughly 300\u2013350 minutes\u2014five to six hours\u2014back per month, before you count reduced stops from mis\u2011centering.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Repeatability also matters. Motorized systems return to known setpoints, narrowing the spread of rail\u2011to\u2011rail distance and improving centering consistency. While explicit tolerances are rarely public, values around \u00b10.5\u20131.0 mm are commonly achievable on modern motorized mechanisms. In contrast, manual settings depend on operator skill and tools, with more variance shift to shift.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If you want numbers you can defend internally, run a quick, repeatable mini-study on your line (even one shift is useful): time 10 width changes per module with a stopwatch (same two widths, same operator), then measure rail spacing\/centering with gauge blocks or a calibrated scale at the same reference points. When requesting quotes, ask suppliers to state (in writing) at least three items: (1) positioning repeatability\/tolerance and the measurement condition, (2) adjustment time or speed across a defined width span, and (3) how width presets are triggered (HMI only vs. host\/barcode\/Hermes-driven recipe recall) and what is logged for traceability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This is where the primary keyword belongs in the narrative: automatic vs manual width adjustment SMT conveyor choices hinge mostly on how much changeover time you need to claw back without inviting quality drift.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Integration and traceability with SMEMA, Hermes, and CFX<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>SMEMA provides the foundational handshake signals to pass boards between modules. For recipe governance and traceability, modern lines layer digital coordination on top:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><p>According to the official Hermes v1.6 specification, equipment passes a BoardId plus board metadata such as dimensions downstream over Ethernet\/WebSocket. There is no standardized \u201cSet Width\u201d command; instead, machines map the BoardId or product identifier to an internal recipe that includes a width preset. See the official document here: <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.the-hermes-standard.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/IPC-HERMES-9852-Version-1.6-HERMES-SITE.pdf\">IPC\u2011HERMES\u20119852 v1.6 specification with board metadata<\/a>.<\/p><\/li><li><p>IPC\u2019s CFX (IPC\u20112591) v2.0 strengthens logging around dynamic recipe changes at the equipment level, which supports auditability for width\u2011related presets when those presets are part of the conveyor\u2019s recipe. Reference: <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.ipc.org\/about-cfx-global-standard-smart-manufacturing-enablement\">IPC overview of the CFX standard and device coverage<\/a>.<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>In practice, automatic width adjustment pairs best with barcode or BoardId\u2011driven recipe recall so rails are at target before the new board arrives. Manual width can still live on a SMEMA line, but traceability is weaker because setpoints are not inherently tied to BoardId without extra procedures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If you want a plain\u2011English shop\u2011floor view of how intelligent transfer modules coordinate lanes and handoffs, this explainer is useful: <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.chuxin-smt.com\/pl\/working-principle-shuttle-conveyor-smt-line-explanation\/\">working principle of shuttle conveyors in SMT lines<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">TCO and ROI when the premium pays for itself<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>You don\u2019t buy features; you buy outcomes. Here\u2019s a lightweight way to estimate whether automatic width pays back for your line.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Simple monthly savings estimate<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><p>Labor time saved per change \u00d7 changes per month \u00d7 fully burdened labor rate<\/p><\/li><li><p>Add avoided scrap\/rework if mis\u2011centering is a known issue<\/p><\/li><li><p>Subtract any increase in maintenance cost<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Simple payback months = Premium CapEx \/ Monthly net savings<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Worked example for a medium\u2011mix line<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><p>Baseline: 6 width changes\/day, 22 days\/month; three modules adjusted each change<\/p><\/li><li><p>Manual time per module: 90 s; automatic time per module: 20 s<\/p><\/li><li><p>Time saved per change: (90 \u2212 20) \u00d7 3 = 210 s \u2248 3.5 min<\/p><\/li><li><p>Monthly time saved: 3.5 min \u00d7 6 \u00d7 22 \u2248 462 min \u2248 7.7 h<\/p><\/li><li><p>Labor rate: $45\/h fully burdened \u2192 labor savings \u2248 $347\/month<\/p><\/li><li><p>Add conservative downtime\/quality savings: $150\/month<\/p><\/li><li><p>Net monthly savings: \u2248 $497<\/p><\/li><li><p>Premium CapEx for automatic vs manual across three modules: $9,000 (illustrative; verify quotes)<\/p><\/li><li><p>Simple payback: $9,000 \/ $497 \u2248 18 months<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<div><div data-widget-id=\"635a81eb-9ffc-43d3-ae1a-04f86729cd75\" data-mode=\"production\"><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>Sensitivity: In most plants, payback is driven mainly by (1) width changes per day, (2) manual seconds per module, and (3) fully burdened labor rate. As a quick check, vary each of those three inputs by \u00b120% and recalculate: you will usually see the payback swing by months. Always validate with your actual stations, shift pattern, and downtime accounting.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Pricing snapshot and disclaimer<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><p>Pricing varies widely by length, sensors, ESD options, safety covers, and protocol\/controls packages; most pricing you will see online is indicative or \u201cprice on request.\u201d Use this category view only as directional context, not a procurement basis: <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/smtindustrialsupply.com\/conveyors\/\">distributor category overview of conveyor pricing<\/a>.<\/p><\/li><li><p>For automatic or motorized width, the premium versus manual is typically quote-driven; treat any percentage uplift as an estimate until you have like-for-like quotations and a defined scope (number of modules, IO\/Hermes options, installation).<\/p><\/li><li><p>All prices and options are subject to change as of 2026-02-11. Always confirm with current vendor quotations and document the quoted configuration in your ROI file.<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Maintenance, safety, and the retrofit path<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Manual mechanisms are simpler\u2014fewer components to service. Automatic systems introduce actuators, sensors, encoders, and related wiring, which require periodic checks and spare parts planning. With sensible access and documented procedures, mean time to repair is typically measured in fractions of a shift for common items, but published MTTR\/MTBF figures for powered width actuators are rare; treat any number you see without a citation cautiously.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Many facilities don\u2019t flip the entire line to automatic on day one. A targeted retrofit on the bottlenecks is common\u2014typically at printers, AOI gates, and between critical buffers. If you want a technical look at modular transfer and centering strategies that support phased upgrades, see this explainer: <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.chuxin-smt.com\/pl\/working-principle-shuttle-conveyor-smt-line-explanation\/\">how shuttle conveyors coordinate flow and alignment on SMT lines<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Retrofit checklist for planning and commissioning<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><p>Physical audit of space, guarding, cable routing, and service access for each target conveyor<\/p><\/li><li><p>IO mapping plan for SMEMA, safety interlocks, and any host\/Hermes triggers for recipe recall<\/p><\/li><li><p>Spares and maintenance plan for actuators, belts, encoders, and guides plus training for techs<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>For some inspection stations, dual or independent width adjustments across segments can smooth handoffs and reduce stops; for a concrete implementation example, review a typical inspection conveyor module\u2019s spec sheet: <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.chuxin-smt.com\/pl\/products\/conveyor-inspection-conveyor\/\">inspection conveyor with segment width adjustment<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How to choose for your line<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Start with your changeover cadence and compliance posture. If your team adjusts width three or more times per day, you\u2019ll generally benefit from automatic width adjustment because the labor and availability gains tend to overcome the CapEx premium within roughly 12\u201324 months. If you change width once or twice per day and your widths are stable, a manual setup can be the more economical choice for now\u2014just ensure you pre\u2011wire for later motorization. When audit trails and recipe governance matter, especially in medical and aerospace, automatic settings paired with Hermes BoardId propagation and CFX\u2011level recipe logging strengthen traceability. For extreme width spans or dual\u2011lane scenarios, confirm min\/max coverage and consider transposition or shuttle modules to maintain centering while staying automated. Legacy lines can phase in automatic width at the worst bottlenecks first, then expand after the gains are proven.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">FAQ<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>What\u2019s best for 3 to 9 width changes per day<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><p>Automatic width adjustment, because recipe\u2011driven presets reduce time and operator variability enough to lift OEE in medium mix.<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>How much time can automatic width save compared to manual<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><p>Trials in related setups show reductions on the order of one to two minutes per event at a module; line\u2011level totals scale with the number of adjusted stations and shifts.<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Can I retrofit automatic width onto existing conveyors<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><p>Yes; kits motorize the rail mechanism and tie into PLC\/IO, with coordination via host signals or Hermes BoardId where available. Installation windows are often measured in hours per module, but confirm with your vendor.<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Does Hermes or CFX directly set the conveyor width<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><p>Hermes v1.6 propagates BoardId and dimensions; the width preset is usually selected by the machine\u2019s own recipe based on that ID. CFX v2.0 helps log the recipe change for traceability rather than issuing a SetWidth command.<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>What\u2019s a typical single\u2011lane width range to verify before purchase<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><p>Many inline SMT conveyors cover roughly 50\u2013460 mm, but check the extremes on your BOM and validate on actual hardware.<\/p><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Also consider real implementations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>If you are exploring concrete modules that support adjustable or automated width with SMEMA baseline integration, S&amp;M Co.Ltd provides a portfolio of inline conveyors and intelligent transfer modules designed for mixed\u2011model lines. For an overview of common module types and ranges, see the product guide page: <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.chuxin-smt.com\/pl\/product\/\">S&amp;M conveyor product overview<\/a>. For stations where independent segment width helps inspection and rework flow, review this example spec: <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.chuxin-smt.com\/pl\/products\/conveyor-inspection-conveyor\/\">inspection conveyor with adjustable width segments<\/a>. For fundamentals on rail alignment and transfer logic used in retrofits, this explainer can help scope your wiring and commissioning plan: <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer nofollow\" class=\"link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.chuxin-smt.com\/pl\/working-principle-shuttle-conveyor-smt-line-explanation\/\">working principle of shuttle conveyors in SMT lines<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Closing thought and next step: If your organization\u2019s target is faster changeovers without trading off quality, automatic vs manual width adjustment SMT conveyor decisions come down to your daily change count and compliance needs. Bring your real numbers\u2014changeovers, labor rate, affected stations\u2014to a quick ROI model, then pilot a targeted retrofit on the worst bottleneck to validate payback before scaling.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Disclosure and review note: This article is maintained by the S&amp;M Co.Ltd team (chuxin-smt.com) and may include links to S&amp;M resources for additional technical context. It is intended as general engineering guidance; for procurement decisions, have an SMT equipment\/process engineer review the assumptions and verify key specs with like-for-like vendor quotes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>About S&amp;M Co.Ltd: Established in 2000, with 27+ years of experience in SMT equipment R&amp;D and manufacturing.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Compare automatic vs manual width adjustment for SMT conveyors\u2014changeover time, repeatability, integration (SMEMA\/Hermes\/CFX), maintenance and TCO to choose the best for medium\u2011mix lines.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":4114,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}}},"categories":[1,52],"tags":[91,60,66,80,61],"class_list":["post-4115","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-company-news","category-product-information","tag-shuttle-conveyor","tag-smt","tag-smt-equipment","tag-smt-line","tag-smt-solution"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chuxin-smt.com\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4115","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chuxin-smt.com\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chuxin-smt.com\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chuxin-smt.com\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chuxin-smt.com\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4115"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.chuxin-smt.com\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4115\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chuxin-smt.com\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4114"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chuxin-smt.com\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4115"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chuxin-smt.com\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4115"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chuxin-smt.com\/pl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4115"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}